Estudo comparativo entre hernioplastia inguinal convencional versus a laparoscópica

Abstract

The Lichtenstein technique is the gold standard tension-free technique for hernia repair, but it regressed from being a favorite when minimally invasive approaches in surgery came into vogue. Laparoscopic hernioplasty techniques are accepted by many surgeons and have come to be applied in many centers. As a result of recent developments in hernia repair, the great debate today about inguinal hernioplasty is which technique provides the most benefits to the patient. and a quicker return to your daily activities, a conventional open tension-free technique or a laparoscopic technique, although both are accepted as standard methods of inguinal hernia repair. The objective of the present study was to carry out a systematic review between inguinal hernioplasty with the Lichtenstein technique and laparoscopy, analyzing the benefits and drawbacks of each one of them, so that it can be defined with greater precision which surgical choice will promote a better post-operative recovery. surgery to the patient. The survey of articles in the literature was carried out by searching the Lilacs, Medline, PubMed and Scielo databases, published between 2019 and 2022. It was concluded, then, that the laparoscopic approach for inguinal hernia is a viable and safe procedure, which has the advantages of pain reduction, faster recovery, earlier return to work and normal activity.